![]() |
Creative Study Group 24 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nancy's post-comment space |
June 25th - Thanks for your all your comments on this
month's image. I can't disagree with any of them. The
comment about grain or noise reminded me, however, that I'd
forgotten that I posterized the image to produce that
grain. It seemed like a good idea at the time but I agree
that it might be better without it. In spite of its many
deficiencies it has been my most successful image in
international salons. Nevertheless, if I still had a
workable image, I would probably try to adjust a few things
in line with your comments.
|
| Jim Hawkins | You say this is a happy accident
and (no doubt) it was beginner's luck but *you* had to have
the eye even then to see it as a competition image! As you can no
longer replicate your procedure and results, there is no point in
pointing out weaknesses to be avoided. The main thing is that it has
the important attributes for a winning EID Creative Image:
tremendous impact, great color, and sound composition. I remember it
from the last PSA Exhibition. Lucky or not, nice job! |
| Frank Crommelin | Very nice image, I love the colors
and it has great flowing lines but the noise/grain just grabs my eye
and takes so much away from the image. |
| Elli Kraizberg |
Playing
with curves always generates random results which
depends also on the level of resolution of the
image. The outcome of your piece is obviously
fascinating . I personally prefer to have more
control on the outcome so to obtain this kind of
results I prefer the use of combination of mask
(difference or overlay) and hue and saturation..
Also two identical layers when one is negative of
the other and then choice of opacity. |
| Ian Ledgard |
What fun you can have
playing with curves; something I find hard to
resist. Sometimes you end up with a fine image as
you have done in this case. Because you have gone
psychedelic I thing you should have added a boldly
coloured frame to set off the effect. Haven't I see
this in a recent International - Suncoast perhaps. I
would also have voted for it if I had been on the
panel. |
| Stephan Funke | A good example of early trials with
interesting details in colorizing and composition. We have a kind of diagonal line and a certain fixed point from where all starts which is out of the middle. (composition). And we have the blue and yellow confrontation. (Complementary colors) I was missing the green / magenta confrontation (instead of orange). The whole thing is a little bit caged. Flowers in nature need space around to move in the wind, this one does not have. |
| Andrés Canepa |
This is one of those
images that I think, the original is better. The
framing is good, and you get color equilibrium and
light balance. In personal, lost de background defocusing and the lens bouquet flat the image. |
|
Nancy Parker - Biography I am a retired university professor. I currently volunteer one day a week in research at the Missouri Botanical Garden on “The Flora of Missouri” project. I have taken pictures casually since I got my first Brownie Hawkeye camera when I was about 12. I got my first 35 mm camera, a Canon AE1, about 40 years ago. I shot kids, grandkids, and mostly nature for years and was “official” field and lab photographer for a large botany group at the university, shooting slides. I joined the St. Louis Camera Club in 2002 and PSA in 2006. Within the past five years I have discovered Photoshop and, continuing my march through the Canon EOS series, moved to digital with the 30D. I still like to shoot nature but I now shoot a variety of subjects and LOVE playing in Photoshop, although I am still a novice. |
Webmaster: Robert B. Gorrill, APSA, MNEC